《博弈論與經(jīng)濟(jì)行為》(GEB)是一本致力于博弈論和it應(yīng)用發(fā)展的綜合性期刊。博弈論的應(yīng)用涵蓋了社會、行為、數(shù)學(xué)和生物科學(xué)的廣泛領(lǐng)域，博弈論方法論借鑒了這些科學(xué)的大量工具。出版標(biāo)準(zhǔn):GEB出版的一般興趣論文顯著地推進(jìn)了博弈論及其應(yīng)用的前沿。這是一個很高的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，但《華爾街日報》的編輯們對相關(guān)的解釋和權(quán)衡持開放態(tài)度。例如，《產(chǎn)業(yè)組織》中關(guān)于企業(yè)并購的一篇論文，如果有助于我們對聯(lián)盟形成的理解，那么它可能具有普遍的博弈論意義。同樣，計算機(jī)算法所玩游戲的分析可能與戰(zhàn)略思維的建模有關(guān)。編輯們對前沿也持開放的態(tài)度。他們樂于發(fā)表論文，盡管這些論文并不在當(dāng)前流行的領(lǐng)域，但它們將引領(lǐng)博弈論和應(yīng)用領(lǐng)域的重大新前沿。因此，鼓勵作者在論文本身明確說明它符合這些出版標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。評估程序:每篇論文最初由GEB的總編輯分配給七名編輯之一(包括他自己)，他擁有最終決定權(quán)。在決定他們的決定時，編輯會咨詢顧問編輯和匿名的審稿人。然后，指定的編輯(非匿名)在決議書中將其決定傳達(dá)給通信作者，通常伴有一個或多個推薦人和/或咨詢編輯的報告。目前，GEB發(fā)表了大約15%的論文。然而，當(dāng)編輯認(rèn)為一篇提交的論文沒有機(jī)會達(dá)到期刊發(fā)表標(biāo)準(zhǔn)時，他們就會在沒有經(jīng)過標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的、漫長的評估過程的情況下“拒絕發(fā)表”該論文。大約三分之一的論文被拒之門外。

Games and Economic Behavior (GEB) is a general-interest journal devoted to the advancement of game theory and it applications. Game theory applications cover a wide range of subjects in social, behavioral, mathematical and biological sciences, and game theoretic methodologies draw on a large variety of tools from those sciences.Publication criteria: GEB publishes general-interest papers that significantly advance the frontiers of game theory and its applications. This is a high bar, but the journal's editors are open-minded about the interpretations and trade-offs involved. For example, a paper in industrial organization that deals with corporate takeover might be of general game-theoretic interest if it contributes to our understanding of coalition formation. Similarly, the analysis of games played by computer algorithms might be relevant to modeling strategic thinking. The editors are also open-minded about the frontiers. They are happy to publish papers that, while not in currently popular areas, lead to significant new frontiers in game theory and applications. Authors are therefore encouraged to make a clear case, in the paper itself, that it meets these publication criteria.Evaluation procedure: Each paper is initially assigned by GEB's chief editor to one of the seven editors (including himself), who has final decision authority. In determining their decisions, editors consult with advisory editors and reviewers who are anonymous to the authors. The assigned editor then (non-anonymously) communicates her/his decision to the corresponding author in a decision letter, usually accompanied by one or more referees' and/or advisory editors' reports. Currently GEB publishes about 15% of the submitted papers. However, when editors decide that a submitted paper does not have a chance of meeting the journal publication criterion, they "desk-reject" the paper without going through the standard, lengthy evaluation process. About one third of the submitted papers are desk-rejected.